Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative

I would cut off my right arm before either of my daughters got this vaccine.

My Goddaughter is 20. She said no too.

It prevents only a small percent of the virus’ linked to cervical cancer. It does not prevent the cancer. They are marketing it wrong.


5 posted on 09/13/2009 7:32:25 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom
"Because cervical cancer runs in her family, "We thought what we were doing was protecting Gabi," Schrag said. "We didn't want to give cancer the opportunity to invade her body in any way."

Obviously Gabi's mother was misinformed as well. It doesn't not protect against those kind of cancers at all, just the ones (supposedly) that result from repeated infections from papilloma virus, which can only result from sex with multiple infected partners- a promiscuous lifestyle to put it politely.

And even then depending on ethnicity, it offers even less protection because some strains are more prevalent among certain ethnicities that Gardasil has no effect whatsoever on.

Abstinence, or a least a monogamous relationship with trusted partners and yearly pap smears are the best ways to prevent cervical cancers caused by repeated papilloma virus exposure, as well as other cancers.

18 posted on 09/13/2009 7:56:45 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson