HIV causes AIDS. However when that finding was originally challenged (*many* years ago), the challenge made a lot of sense, and wasn’t taken nearly as seriously as it should have been in most circles. Your claim that “Many biochemical scientists now question this hypothesis” are wildly outdated. No one who still questions the fact that HIV causes AIDS is a “scientist” of any sort. But there were a lot of real scientists who should have been ashamed of themselves for jumping so firmly to the conclusion that HIV causes AIDS, long before there was anything more than circumstantial evidence of this, and for arrogantly dismissing the very valid arguments which were initially advanced to point out that the connection/causality had yet to be scientifically proven.
==HIV causes AIDS.
The scientific evidence points to other causes.
==Your claim that “Many biochemical scientists now question this hypothesis” are wildly outdated. No one who still questions the fact that HIV causes AIDS is a “scientist” of any sort.
You couldn’t be more wrong. The list of scientists and medical doctors who questin the HIV/AIDS hypothesis grows bigger with each passing day. These include Nobel Prize Winners, Lasker Prize winners, members of the National Academy of Sciences, etc.
http://www.rethinkingaids.com/quotes/rethinkers.htm
==But there were a lot of real scientists who should have been ashamed of themselves for jumping so firmly to the conclusion that HIV causes AIDS
Agreed. And they should still feel ashamed of themselves, because the vast majority of the scientific evidence suggests that AIDS is not caused by HIV. Indeed, Duesberg et al’s predictions have virtually all come to pass, whereas the AIDS establishment predictions were wrong (and continue to be wrong) across the board.