Be sure to archive the Socialist Party's webpage before they scrub it once all the hits start coming in from here.
Also, be sure to check out her Socialist verbiage here:
PhilanthropyUK
In particular, pay attention to:
"Rowling established the Volant Charitable Trust, which uses its annual budget of £5.1m to aid women and children and to combat poverty and
social inequality."
That is more commie-speak!
To: DoctorBulldog
I am dead set against those who believe that a larger government will be beneficial to our fundamental rights. Your position on JK Rowling, however, is an over-reach. The HP storyline is so open you can read any kind of political philosophy into it, with the possible exception of race-based systems. The fact that the Australian Socialist Party is leveraging it - so what. If Ms Rowling wants to give money to various charities, so be it. If you want to charge her with being a socialist then please provide more substance.
2 posted on
09/07/2009 12:35:48 PM PDT by
bjc
(Check the data!!)
To: DoctorBulldog
Funny, I’ve read the books and find them to be quite conservative. Rowling is free to support any causes she wishes personally.
3 posted on
09/07/2009 12:43:17 PM PDT by
Dianna
To: DoctorBulldog
The woman wrote herself off of the dole. That’s something to be admired.
4 posted on
09/07/2009 12:49:27 PM PDT by
OpeEdMunkey
(Eat right,...exercise...die anyway.)
To: DoctorBulldog
addressing inequality with your own money is communist? It would appear to me that Obama used the reference to Rowling's rejections as she is an author that kids are familiar with. I doubt a reference to Ayn Rand would have resonated quite so well.
As i've said before, I seriously doubt this speech is the one he intended to give. But i have no problem with the one I've read.
5 posted on
09/07/2009 12:51:28 PM PDT by
jdub
(A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.)
To: DoctorBulldog
JKR has encouraged an entire generation of kids to read by writing an entertaining series of challenging novels. Claiming that she is a socialist simply makes conservatives look silly in a very public way.
6 posted on
09/07/2009 12:58:06 PM PDT by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: DoctorBulldog
Give the 5.1m away, it still won’t fix poverty. The only way to fix poverty is to make us all poor, and then who will we look to?
7 posted on
09/07/2009 1:01:58 PM PDT by
listenhillary
(We became community organizers and Obama and the Statists get p*ssed off at us?)
To: DoctorBulldog
who'd ya expect... Ayn Rand???
13 posted on
09/07/2009 2:08:00 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
To: DoctorBulldog
Well, her plan didn’t work. My 15 year old son has read every HP book a dozen times each and watches the movies over and over again, but he has a very good grasp of the attributes of a free society. He is definitely not a socialist.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson