Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TommyDale

Once again I will have to explain the title of my posting to a certain few maroons who don’t quite get it........ok, I’ll write very slowly for you........

My objection is to the “media coverage” of Tiger Woods, not of Tiger Woods.

Let me know if you need more help in understanding this.


8 posted on 09/06/2009 12:29:38 PM PDT by Gillmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Gillmeister

If the media coverage bothers you, why not turn it off? As long as the media gets higher ratings and thus MORE INCOME from the coverage of Tiger Woods, they will continue. He brings higher viewer ratings to PGA events, and larger attendance as well. You are to blame. If you and everyone like you that dislikes the coverage would turn off their sets, they would have fewer viewers.


12 posted on 09/06/2009 12:36:58 PM PDT by TommyDale (Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson