Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Assault

Don’t know for sure but it goes back decades if not centuries. Europeans often do it slightly differently to reduce confusion - they use roman numerals for the month so for August 7 1961 you might see 7/viii/1961 but they still put the month in the middle, not first.


26 posted on 09/04/2009 8:20:32 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: 1066AD
The 'dd/mm/yyyy' format does not appear to be a universal style in England yet.

From this website in a thread called "American vs British style of writing dates":

http://www.antimoon.com/forum/t1952-45.htm

David Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:32 pm GMT

What a stupid discussion:

Fact is:

Both day-month-year and month-day-year are used in Britain. And the month-day-year version is even preferred by British newspapers:

Let's see:

The Times: February 17, 2005

Guardian: Feburary 17, 2005

Economist: February 17th 2005

And there are also influential American publications (especially academic publications) that use day-month-year, for example:

Science Magazine: 17 February 2005

Physical Review Letters: 17 February 2005

****

and from Saturday's Times of London, check out the date, September 5, 2009:

.

43 posted on 09/05/2009 6:40:02 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: 1066AD

Roman numerals??


93 posted on 09/07/2009 6:12:36 AM PDT by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson