[BGHater]

‘protections for seniors.’

I know it's politics. But, why must ‘they’ put people in groups? Why not protections for all individuals?

[tiki]

I agree but in this case it really would be seniors and chronically/terminally ill people who would suffer.

[domenad]

I was thinking the exact thing. The individual is getting lost. Sure, we can use this as a wedge, but are you going to end up beholden to a group of seniors with their hands out? Is that any better than what Obama does?