Is Russia setting the stage for a nuclear apocalypse?

Canadian Free Press ^ | Monday, August 24, 2009 | By Doug Hagmann and Sean Osborne

[GeronL]

They might have delivered nukes to terrorists for all we know. I doubt Obummer cares

[clamper1797]

Though there is a chance that Russia may be doing this ... but there is NO DOUBT in my mind that FUBO is ...

[Nervous Tick]

>> They might have delivered nukes to terrorists for all we know. I doubt Obummer cares

Hell, it wouldn’t surprise me if Bambi were in on it.

[stripes1776]

As Winston Churchill said in 1939:

"I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest."

They are always a significant number of Russians who consider themselves neither European nor Asian, even though their country spans both continents. These Slovophiles claim that Russia is uniquely her own realm. Russian will do what is good for Russia. Combine this perspective with the idea that many Russians have that their country is the natural successor to the Roman Empire and you get an extremely narrow form of nationalism. Another name for this narrow nationalism is fascism, whether socialist of communist.

One of the terms for communism in the 1930s was red fascism. It is alive and growing in Russia today.

[GOPJ]

I doubt the boy scouts were buying the nukes...

[Chode]

i never believed it was hijacking... what kind of ransom can you ask for with a cargo worth LESS than $2million?

[GOPJ]

The security implications pertaining to this incident are indeed ominous as they appear to directly relate to either a clandestine program of arming an enemy of the United States and Israel with nuclear weaponry or something far more sinister and conspiratorial.

What on earth could be "far more sinister and conspiratorial"?

[GOPJ]

The security implications pertaining to this incident are indeed ominous as they appear to directly relate to either a clandestine program of arming an enemy of the United States and Israel with nuclear weaponry or something far more sinister and conspiratorial.

Ping

What on earth could be "far more sinister and conspiratorial"?

[your local physicist]

Bookmark for later read.

[nuconvert]

“What on earth could be “far more sinister and conspiratorial”?”

arming more than one enemy of the United States and Israel with nuclear weaponry?

[GOPJ]

That’s how the Russians compromised out early atomic scientists - they convinced them that if all are equally “armed” the world’s safer. Sounds like a variation of that bulls-it.

[arthurus]

Is this available somewhere else? I cannot get anything other than a blank page with Canada Free Press.

[mowowie]

same here

[Irisshlass]

That is strange..I just hit on the link, not a problem..

Try this.. http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2994

[MHGinTN]

A practice run for the wandering into New York harbor of a ‘hijacked’ freighter, from al Qaeda ... with a 2o megaton nuclear device on board. Or, if you prefer, a dry run on how to get an EMP weapon to our Eastern shores under color of some ‘other’ enemy than Russia. Of course, once the East Coast and all electronically stored data is toast, whom do we suppose is poised to become the lone super-power of the world? Thaaaat’s right, Puti Putin’s energy self-sufficient Russian bear.

[arthurus]

Thanks. That goes right to it.

[khnyny]

Another source:

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/08/26/world/international-us-russia-ship-cargo.html

[Palin Republic]

Bambi might not care, but Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is his CFR handler, sure as heck does.

[bitt]

pingo