Posted on 08/26/2009 7:16:32 PM PDT by Irisshlass
cant say anything about the roots of this story and I dont plan to dig further I need to think about my own skin too. Understand that as you will. Mikhail Voitenko, editor of the Russian maritime Bulletin Sovfrakht., speaking about the hijacking of the Arctic Sea
While it might seem like an unusual morphing of the movies Inside Man and The Hunt for Red October, the account of the cargo ship Arctic Sea is far stranger than either fictional account. Based on information developed through our extensive investigation, we can authoritatively state, without hyperbole, that the mysteries surrounding the MV Arctic Sea as deep as the Atlantic waters where it navigated and its alleged secret cargo as potentially dangerous to an unsuspecting, distracted populace as the coastal rip tides produced by a late summer hurricane.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
They might have delivered nukes to terrorists for all we know. I doubt Obummer cares
Though there is a chance that Russia may be doing this ... but there is NO DOUBT in my mind that FUBO is ...
>> They might have delivered nukes to terrorists for all we know. I doubt Obummer cares
Hell, it wouldn’t surprise me if Bambi were in on it.
"I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest."They are always a significant number of Russians who consider themselves neither European nor Asian, even though their country spans both continents. These Slovophiles claim that Russia is uniquely her own realm. Russian will do what is good for Russia. Combine this perspective with the idea that many Russians have that their country is the natural successor to the Roman Empire and you get an extremely narrow form of nationalism. Another name for this narrow nationalism is fascism, whether socialist of communist.
One of the terms for communism in the 1930s was red fascism. It is alive and growing in Russia today.
I doubt the boy scouts were buying the nukes...
What on earth could be "far more sinister and conspiratorial"?
Ping
What on earth could be "far more sinister and conspiratorial"?
Bookmark for later read.
“What on earth could be “far more sinister and conspiratorial”?”
arming more than one enemy of the United States and Israel with nuclear weaponry?
That’s how the Russians compromised out early atomic scientists - they convinced them that if all are equally “armed” the world’s safer. Sounds like a variation of that bulls-it.
Is this available somewhere else? I cannot get anything other than a blank page with Canada Free Press.
same here
That is strange..I just hit on the link, not a problem..
Try this.. http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2994
A practice run for the wandering into New York harbor of a ‘hijacked’ freighter, from al Qaeda ... with a 2o megaton nuclear device on board. Or, if you prefer, a dry run on how to get an EMP weapon to our Eastern shores under color of some ‘other’ enemy than Russia. Of course, once the East Coast and all electronically stored data is toast, whom do we suppose is poised to become the lone super-power of the world? Thaaaat’s right, Puti Putin’s energy self-sufficient Russian bear.
Thanks. That goes right to it.
Another source:
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/08/26/world/international-us-russia-ship-cargo.html
Bambi might not care, but Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is his CFR handler, sure as heck does.
pingo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.