To: Justaham
Wouldn't that be an ex post facto law? The seat is vacant and the clock has already started ticking for electing the replacement. Can they still switch the replacement method? What if it was one day before the election and it looked like a Republican was likely to win - could they change the selection method then?
6 posted on
08/26/2009 11:20:33 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
("I can run wild for six months ...after that, I have no expectation of success" - Admiral Obama-moto)
To: KarlInOhio
Wouldn't that be an ex post facto law? The seat is vacant and the clock has already started ticking for electing the replacement. Can they still switch the replacement method? What if it was one day before the election and it looked like a Republican was likely to win - could they change the selection method then? Interesting point and legal conundrum for the Rats, not that they ever let a pesky thing like the law ever stop them from doing whatever is necessary to advance their corrupt agenda.
But I think you are right in that its "after the fact," and the "Clock began running" exactly 1 second after The Swimmer assumed room temp.
10 posted on
08/26/2009 11:25:21 AM PDT by
Conservative Vermont Vet
((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
To: KarlInOhio
“Wouldn’t that be an ex post facto law? The seat is vacant and the clock has already started ticking for electing the replacement”
I’m no law-talkin’-guy, but I don’t think it would be ex post facto unless a replacement had already been elected.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson