My company is one of many working on bringing 3D technology to the masses.
We expect that these glasses will be under $100, shooting for $50 in Qty 100.
Maybe you'd know, why do 3D glasses need such a thick frame ? Couldn't they be made lighter and more comfortable with thinner framework?
So I would have to buy a new plasma TV, a new Blu-Ray player, they would have to both have the new 1.4 HDMI, I would have to buy several sets of shutter glasses. I would do all this to watch a handful of movies actually shot in 3D.
This won’t catch on until TV broadcasts start to go in 3D. After the effort to switch them over to HD I don’t expect the 3D thing to catch on for another 20 years. I hope your company isn’t banking on the success of these glasses.
Guess I’ll wait until I get rich - but I can’t afford a 3DHD now anyway.
Who is the subcontractor for the frame material? Bazooka?