Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia

I think even if unmeasurable that something belongs to either reality or unreality portion. Observer always discovers the reality portion (which is static?)


34 posted on 08/18/2009 11:32:38 AM PDT by dimk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: dimk
"I think even if unmeasurable that something belongs to either reality or unreality portion. Observer always discovers the reality portion (which is static?)"

Yes, the "reality" set is always static...until it changes and becomes the new reality.

However, in the "unreality" set...all "change" and all potential states exist. Since we are in the reality set, we can only see reality.

However, we can imagine unreality.

Sheesh. That's a boatload of conceptual thinking to digest over the next decade or so...

44 posted on 08/18/2009 11:52:16 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: dimk

I gathered that the reality portion was that which is static regardless of dimensionality or measurability (i.e. the atomic weight of X is Y). The unreality was that which is dynamic or incapable of accurate measure dependent upon the dimensionality or measurability.

...ok, now I’m confused.


49 posted on 08/18/2009 12:06:12 PM PDT by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / MOLWN LABE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson