I knew that. One of the clear hacks on the original certificate is substitution of the zero in the 47044 for another number. Further, what they substitute is a capital oh "O". It's obvious.
On the original copy, that was not the case.
I am however a little concerned at what I hear as an affirmation by Polarik that the original certificate is a fake.
Because a source in which I do have some confidence tells me that it is the same on its face, maybe a copy, of a document that was obtained by investigators that was delivered to at least one of the political organizations.
According to the source, the information is essentially the same as information on the original birth documents. Further, their understanding of the provenance of the document is that it was ordered as part of the court proceeding in connection with the divorce--they thought it was genuine.
Polarik said that he was taking time off from FR, so I’ll answer that one as best I may.
Polarik did make an early response to the effect that the Taitz Kenyan BC was a “fake.” He did so citing grounds which have since been shown to be questionable: that Kenya was then not a “Republic,” and that it belonged to Zanzibar. In fact, the Coast Province had been ceded to England long before, except for the Sharia Courts, and we still have not seen COLBs issued by the province at that time to prove or disprove whether this one is genuine. But it DOES fit neatly into the timeline for Stanley’s divorce from Obama Sr. The problem, of course, is that Obama’s murderous cousin Odinga is PM of Kenya, and it won’t be easy to get any factual evidence from there. Indeed, he is presumably destroying any evidence that currently exists.
Polarik did not, as far as I know, ever suggest that it was a “forgery.” Several forged Kenyan COLBs quickly appeared after Taitz posted hers, and I believe Polarik said as much, but hers was not the forgery. The others all showed signs of being forged, presumably by Kossites or Obamaphiles.
So, I would say that the remark that it was a “fake” was just a first impression on Polarik’s part, not a considered judgment, and it was made before all the historical evidence about the “Republic” question had emerged.