I think finding a camp site and calling it a house is just as silly, but we must keep reinforcing the prevailing paradigm, less some one get the idea that we archeologist's don't have a clue and wing it to get more grant funds.
That foundation looks real enough.
“I think finding a camp site and calling it a house is just as silly,”
Not sure where in the (complete) article one would think this was a campsite, it clearly had a years-long period of habitation, wood structure, etc.