I find Dawkins comical. He never responds to any questions from his critics except to ask them back the same question about their own (presumably Christian) faith, laced with some naughty words about Christians in particular.
Not only has he never been able to logically prove that there's no Judeo-Christian God, or any other type of god, he's even said he himself is not entirely convinced of there being no gods whatsoever ("there's probably no God?" Come on, where are your balls!). I would imagine that someone who uses logic to reject one set of beliefs would certainly use logic to accept another set of beliefs. The only problem is that Dawkins' own beliefs do not rise from logic, as he likes to claim, but rather his own faith that there are indeed no supernatural beings of any sort, as he is unwilling and unable to offer proof for this assertion.
Such rhetoric only serves to convince me that Dawkins is no atheist, but rather yet another anti-Christian bigot who would never attack any faith other than those of Christian flavor.
Psst - one can never “prove” a negative. As such, one can never honestly reject the claim of a deity’s existence 100%.
Dawkins is being consistent.