IIRC the ‘apology’ was addressed to ‘All’ which I found strange at the time.
Geez o’ man! I;ve been trying all night to stay off this thread. Oh well.
FWIW
Some of these posts are what a judge would call badgering. At the very least, the accusations against Danae are disingenuous. Polarik DID accuse her of posting a FORGED document and THIS was his PROOF. He was absolutely dead wrong:
**********************************
From Polarik:
This COLB is a forgery, and a really bad one, too.
The date-stamp on the back is totally bogus. You can clearly see that it was added to an existing image: a scan of a COLB folded twice into quarters. The fact that a deep fold runs right theough the middle of the date yet, the date is as straight as if it were on a perfectly flat piece of paper.
On closer examination, you can immediately see how the letters are all thin, jagged and broken apart, and surrounded by pixel haloes.
Here are some images I made that illustrate the forging:
BAD STAMP:
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/New-COLBS/DANA-MAR-2007-CU.jpg
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/New-COLBS/bad-date.jpg
FOLDS ON THE BACK, BUT NOT ON THE FRONT, AND VICE-VERSA:
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/New-COLBS/fold-1.gif
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/New-COLBS/fold-2.gif
*********************************************
His “proof” was BASELESS. Nothing about her posted doc was bogus. It definitely was NOT a forgery. You and others keep citing the date as proof that she was “almost forging” this thing?
He flat out stated it was added AFTER the fact and that SHE did it on purpose. How in the world do you “ALMOST” forge something? Why are you defending him?
How is it HER fault he called it a forgery when it clearly was NOT?
