Posted on 08/04/2009 11:09:28 AM PDT by MissTickly
"Dear Orly:
PER YOUR CURRENT KENYAN BC: Are working FOR Obama, Orly? I am on to you.
THIS IS A SHAM. You knew the following BEFORE you filed your recent debacle in court. I know, I wrote and told you so did another poster:
This is not a good pursuit of things as it could result in placing The President's VITAL RECORDS under court seal, keeping, We, the People, who have Oversight of the agency, who has the Oversight of the records from legally viewing them per UIPA Provisions (§92F-12) (3) (15).
This is a legal and responsible route to pursue the documents. I have done so and asked that ’significant privacy information’ per exceptions found in (§92F-13(1) be omitted from the records. As lawyer, Orly knows this is true.
The ’significant privacy information’ per Obama’s Vital Records are these: DOB & Ethnicity
Place of birth, hospital, address at the time of birth, weight, etc.. ARE NOT considered ’significant privacy information’ per by the UIPA open records law in Hawaii and most states in America as far as I can tell.
These provisions in context of Fukino’s TWO public statements and the current political climate MANDATE that disclosure of his VITAL RECORDS serves the Public. (§92F-12) (3) (15)
UIPA STATUTE Part II: “To balance the individual privacy interest and the public interest, allowing access unless disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Given this direction that the UIPA be interpreted to promote open government, any doubt regarding disclosure of a record should likely be resolved IN FAVOR OF ACCESS.”
DEAR ALL FREEPERS:
Orly, I believe, is working for OBAMA. Please urge her to step off, she's not helping the cause for truth. I suspect it is entirely intentional, too. She's a lawyer and knows about the Hawaiian OPEN RECORDS LAW. Yet, she hasn't tried to pursue it? There are TWO provisions that call for the public disclosure--she KNOWS THIS.
Think about it--where has she found all the resources to keep pursuing this when others have not? Has she ever helped this cause so far--in terms of GETTING ANSWERS?
WELL, I HAVE. This is MY story, that happened, Monday, July, 27:
On a whim I decided to try my hand at a question for Janice Okubo, Communications Director for the Department of Health that holds the President’s vital records. Believe me when i say I have not sought an answer to the ‘birther’ question in any formal way ever before this day. I emailed her and I asked her about AMENDED original birth certificates, something which by sheer existence alone, usually (not always) indicates a person was ADOPTED:
In a nutshell, this is what I asked her:
“Ms. Okubo–
Director Fukino made this statement (Oct 2008): ““Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures… ” Therefore, she has the statutory authority to answer this question:
“Is the Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, able to state they have verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has President Barack Obama’s AMENDED original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures?” Please reply with her answer.”
You see, they have the same statutory authority over an Amended Original Birth Certificate that they have over an (unamended) Original Birth Certificate. No one has to attest to an Amended Original Birth Certificate’s existence or have ‘tangible interest’ in the record. By virtue of STATUTORY AUTHORITY alone she can answer my question, AND she clearly says so.
But, to my surprise, at 11:47 p.m. on Monday, July 27, 2009 I got an electronic press release with a new statement, the first in EIGHT months with the ‘natural born citizen’ stuff people have been talking about all week:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
I had this sent directly to me by Janice Okubo, herself, in response to my emailed question. And I suspect I had it hours before the press had it. I searched Google for any reference to this statement. None. Not even FactCheck.org had it.
Of course, since they are able to drive the story through the media they needlessly added the stuff about being ‘natural born’ and ‘born in Hawaii’ to the answer to my question and to detract from the affirmative answer to my question and to fit their agenda. It was the headline on Yahoo! by the following morning.
But the answer to my carefully crafted question was there none-the-less:
“original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures...”
BECAME “original vital records [plural] maintained on file”
This was too vague for my taste, so I asked for clarity. So, I asked specifically if the Director would make a statement that she has the STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO MAKE: “As Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, I have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has President Barack Obama’s AMENDED original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” But I got this in return: “The director has nothing further to add to her statements.”
I let Ms. Okubo know that I fear something is preventing Dr. Fukino from making statements she does have the authority to make. Duress? And told her I was compelled to tell someone. I did, I sent an email to two major networks.
ANYWAY: Knowing in my heart why they made that statement on Monday, I pressed on. I looked at the UIPA Open Records Act in Hawaii and found ANYONE can make a request--not just Hawaiians. So using the question I’d already asked, I filed a UIPA Information Request.
Then I thought about it some more. The way I worded it felt wrong and it seemed like an inappropriate way to use the UIP Act and I withdrew it immediately and telling them I didn’t have the stomach for it.
Then I went back and read the UIPA Guidelines thoroughly and found the provision(s) that require the RESPONSIBLE disclosure of ALL OBAMA’S VITAL RECORDS citing not one, but TWO provisions. I want you to read my formal request and the follow up statements I sent. Read them in the order I have listed them, which is backward in chronological order beginning with today’s follow up. I think they read better that way. They have 10 days to respond, and I have recourse beyond The Dept. of Health noncompliance if that’s the case. I can re-file with the Hawaii Office of Information Practices for thier ruling.
---
None of this LEGITIMATE EFFORT will make a difference if Orly pursues this. She is a lawyer, she knows I have followed UIPA Guidelines per Hawaii's Open Records Law and that I have made a case for disclosure.
I feel I must expose this, and I am sorry if anyone disgrees but this has become apparent to me.
Thanks for listening with an open ear!
There was a poster, MrMeanGenes, that posted here, Kos and HuffPo. I told him he couldn’t have a foot in both camps. He asked why not. A few days later, he left FR. It says: “A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways”. That’s true.
Then you are attacking Orly when she is probably the only one who is truly innocent in all this.
I am going to drop this for now, but if you want to see where you are going, you have to remember where you came from. YOU were a hillary supporter and a rather extreme one at that.
Didn’t it strike you as odd that hillary capitulated to obama so easily at the convention?
Didn’t you truly wonder why she screwed her supporters when she CLEARLY had the machine AND the votes to take the nomination?
Berg was a hillary supporter too. She doesn’t need him anymore. He is left twisting slowly, slowly. But he did his job. He sowed the seeds of doubt.
NOW, comes the new Kenyan certificate. Keyes is the client. Orly is JUST a lawyer who was chosen to finish off the deal.
Keyes is black, Can’t cry racism on the left. Keyes is a disgruntled conservative who “lost” an election, IN CHICAGO, to obama. No backlash and no obvious connection to hillary.
The clintons had Alinsky down when obama was in diapers.
“They answer affirmative when I asked Hawaiian officials if he had an AMENDED BIRTH CERTIFICATE. Please read ALL of what I wrote before commenting”
Where did you write about their answer to your inquiries?
YOU SAID: “A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways”. That’s true.”
Right now, Obots are saying this:
“A BIRTHER is unstable in all his ways”. That’s true.
I submit neither are true, but will take this opportunity to leave FreeRepublic per your suggestions.
I felt I could speak freely here without the left wing tactics of ridicule.
**THANKS to you guys that gave me some credit, and for your time. I still hope we all come out on top on this issue. I wish you well!***
You don’t need to leave unless the mods give you the boot. It’s a tough crowd here, me often times being the toughest. Gotta have thick skin.
What is a lawyers first job? PROTECT your client.
What has )bama spent over a million dollars on? Lawyer protection on his birth certificate.
What will happen if Orly gets too close? - Petition by )bamas mouthpiece to have the records sealed.
Don't think it's too crazy not to happen. You're not from Chicago.
PS - No I did not have a keyboard malfunction. )bama is less than zero....so he gets half )
Your pathetic attempt to illustrate sexism by cherry picking excerpts from alleged right wing bloggers, falls short of the truth. I recognize your MO
An example is : I submit neither are true,
We believe in absolutes. A double minded man IS unstable as he tries to trod two paths and can't pick one and stick to it. That's an absolute truth.
I mostly read, and skim through the BC threads. This one is actually annoying me—espec after the admin mod’s post. :-p
Carry on folks..
I will answer you on this: “A double minded man IS unstable as he tries to trod two paths and can’t pick one and stick to it.”
I submit that I am taking a non-partisan THIRD path. And I don’t deserve to be picked apart for having the guts to come learn about the ‘right’ on a personal level.
Mystically? Well, aren’t you the clever one.
Yeah, who are you? /s lol
I’m not picking you apart. I want to save all of us some grief. If you can deal with us, hang out. Quite honestly, I couldn’t post on a lefty site like Kos or HuffPo. I’m too opinionated and I’d blow a gasket.
guess my response was just late. 4 hours lol
If you did just a bit more digging, you would have seen I have barely visited in the last year.
But there’s no honesty to what you guys are doing throwing out comments and facts with NO context. That, I don’t need.
“I’m not picking you apart. I want to save all of us some grief. If you can deal with us, hang out. Quite honestly, I couldn’t post on a lefty site like Kos or HuffPo. I’m too opinionated and I’d blow a gasket.”
Okay. I'll hold my fire and observe with a critical eye for now.
Yes, she said it. We can't read freepmails but the poster who reported this has been a freeper in excellent standing for years and has never lied. In fact, I don't recall her ever complaining before.
Ok. Bye.
Oh and A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways is in the Book of James 1:8.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.