A law is not a law simply because you say it is a law.
Instead, you need to find legislation that defines NBC to be as you say and you are not able to do that.
I don’t claim to know the definition I said. I can just read clearly yours is not it.
Now, I want to know what Hawaii thinks a NBC is.
Sure it is. If Obama was not born on the island and has a british father and a mother who can not confer citizenship, that Obama had a late filed registration of live birth, he has an amended file and is not a Natural Born Citizen.
The point is, we don’t know what is in the file, and until we DO we can not say for sure that Obama is a Natural Born citizen under the FEDERAL defination of Natural Born.
In Hawaii the AMENDED birth Certificate, regardless of circumstances because Hawaii allowed the registration of foregin born babies, has the SAME legal weight as a baby born in a hospital with a Dr. signature on the thing. This means that according to Hawaiian standards an Amended Birth certificate gives Natural Born Status under Hawaiian law.
This of course does not meet FEDERAL standards for Natural Born.
I have to add here that the press releases from Hawaii do say something like ‘in accordance with Hawaiian law’ thats a paraphrase, but it amounts to that.
What’s wrong with the definition that the Senate used in Senate Resolution 511 — both parents had to be American citizens and birth on American soil? The Senate Resolution may not have the force of law but it is a studied determination based upon just exactly what the Senate, including Obama, decided that a natural born citizen was.
Wrong and wrong and wrong. Read the 1874 opinion by the Supreme Court. Why do you persist in this error? Is it ignorance or are you a troll?