Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rationalist101
Can we use this standard to apply to "proving" Obama was born in Hawaii?

You can’t discard... theory simply because it is an inference from evidence. You need to counter it either with new evidence or superior inference. Be careful here. You can’t infer “things” into existence. You need physical measurements to prove that “things, objects” exist.

Where is the proof he has a long form Hawaiian birth certificate?

People saying "I've seen it"? What is the compelling reason to continue to supress it?

50 posted on 07/28/2009 9:28:56 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

It has already been widely reported that the so-called “long form” for Obama no longer exists. However, the overwhelming weight of the evidence that does exist points to the notion that Obama was indeed born in Hawaii when he said he was. I am not aware of any evidence that he was born anywhere else. Do you have any of that? I swear, I’ll look at it objectively and weigh it against the evidence that he is a natural born citizen. Please, present your evidence. If you don’t have any then I suggest that all this flap is doing is making the right looked crazed.


53 posted on 07/28/2009 12:46:04 PM PDT by Rationalist101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson