Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: leilani; Baynative; luv2ski; nutmeg; Mom MD; commish; Mr. Blonde
I do not have a good feeling about this, and wonder what or who is running it. Not surprised to see SCA involved, I think they are still pissed that they had to pay Lance the $5+ million.


Prosecutors Step Up Armstrong Probe

Investigators Subpoena Documents and a Witness in Bid to Prove the Tour de France Champion Used Banned Substances

By REED ALBERGOTTI And VANESSA O'CONNELL

Federal prosecutors handling an investigation into cheating in professional cycling have subpoenaed documents from an arbitration case that sought to prove that Lance Armstrong used performance-enhancing drugs.

The documents contain depositions from former teammates and associates of the seven-time Tour de France champion during a period when a promotions company was trying to prove that Mr. Armstrong employed banned drugs and practices—known as doping—during his cycling career.

Jeffrey Tillotson, the attorney who represented the company, SCA Promotions Inc., in the arbitration hearings, said it received a subpoena for the records on July 16. He is preparing to send the files to the federal prosecutors in Los Angeles who are handling the investigation, he said.

Mr. Armstrong has repeatedly denied doping allegations and has not been charged with any wrongdoing.

Using performing-enhancing techniques in sports is generally not against the law in the U.S. But federal prosecutors could make the case that Mr. Armstrong defrauded investors by accepting sponsorship dollars with the understanding that he would not use the drugs, if they prove that he doped.

...

The money quote:

"Prosecutors "aren't going to charge somebody with doping," said Mike Straubel, an attorney at the Valparaiso University Sports Law Clinic in Indiana, who represents athletes. "They are going to charge somebody with a secondary offense of fraud in some fashion—perjury or lying to a federal investigator."

227 posted on 07/27/2010 8:27:16 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Sure I've heard of grits. I just never actually *seen* a grit before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Ready4Freddy

It seems like at best so far they have a whole lot of innuendo. A bunch of one on one conversations that may or may not have taken place. I guess eventually they can gather enough smoke to convince a jury there was a fire at one point, but it is going to take a lot of work.

Frankly I’m totally indifferent to conversations that took place pre-cancer. Even if he doped then, that doesn’t prove that he was doping after. He came back with a much different body and outlook.


228 posted on 07/27/2010 8:55:47 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

To: Ready4Freddy
"Prosecutors "aren't going to charge somebody with doping," said Mike Straubel, an attorney at the Valparaiso University Sports Law Clinic in Indiana, who represents athletes. "They are going to charge somebody with a secondary offense of fraud in some fashion—perjury or lying to a federal investigator."

TRANSLATION: An ambitious prosecutor wishing to garner publicity for himself by going after celebrities can still get his name in the papers & burnish his CV even if in the end he only wins the mickey mouse tacked-on charges.

If you initiate an investigation not to seek justice for a crime committed, but to to trap somebody for lying to authorities during the investigation itself, you still get just as rich & famous as the attorneys who pursue suspects with the intent of actually proving that the very alleged crimes which precipitated the investigation did indeed occur.

Kinda makes ya feel all warm & fuzzy inside about our federal justice system, doesn't it?

Gee, it's just too darn bad Ironman doesn't have a fishing expedition component in its competition. Looks like Lance will be getting a lot of practice for that in before Hawaii if he does indeed decide to enter.

230 posted on 07/27/2010 4:09:00 PM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson