Still, I keep coming back to the same, admittedly threadbare & utterly cynical rationale: even if it's true what everybody including Landis now says that everybody in pro cycling was/is doping, then the worst you can say is that an allegedly doping Lance won all those tours on a level-playing field, and he did it by riding that course smarter & better prepared than all his also-allegedly-doping competitors.
What was that ancient freeper saying invented for times just like this? Unnnnnggggghhhhh? Maybe I misspelled it, but you get the drift, so:
Uhhhnnnnngghghghghgh times eleventy!
Shame if Hincappie has been doping. He’s always been a big strong rider since his younger than junior days in the mid-80’s.