Interesting.
What are your thoughts on the implications of all the above?
. . . that you’re willing to share hereon!??
The access may have been to assess liability.
The multiple access provides cover.
The access done by an employee "without instruction or knowledge of the contractor (Brennan)" provides deniability.
Brennan withdrew in the face of "torture" flak, but remains a significant advisor.
Brennan would be familiar with the creation and maintenance of a legend, and is therefore particularly useful.