Skip to comments.
Mysterious ancient altar found in Roman fort (In England)
Discovery ^
 | Rossella Lorenzi
Posted on 07/25/2009 7:09:40 AM PDT by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-36 next  last
    
1
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:09:41 AM PDT
by 
decimon
 
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:10:33 AM PDT
by 
decimon
 
To: decimon
    Anatolian god Juppiter?
Sorry, Jupiter was a Roman god. And he could spell it right I imagine.
Unless the writer means Ppluto.Or Ppan.
At any rate it is probably Mithras who was the soldier’s diety and was concerned with bulls.
 
To: decimon
    >The Romans built the defensive wall across the north of Britain ... to keep out invading armies from what is now Scotland
 
 
  
     | 
    The Scotts aren't bad  when they're not painting themselves  like the Blue Man group . . . 
    | 
  
 
 
To: squarebarb
    Anatolian god Juppiter? Sorry, Jupiter was a Roman god. And he could spell it right I imagine.
 No, the identification is correct (though you're rght, the name is spelled wrong, by our typical English standard). "Jupiter of Doliche" indicates that this god was a local syncretisation of an Anatolian god with Jupiter, in much the same way that Zeus/Jupiter would be syncretised with any other Eastern god. The battle axe symbol probably does indicate some syncretism with Mithraic concepts, though the lack of the Phrygian cap would seem to suggest that this figure is not Mithra himself.
 
5
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:27:37 AM PDT
by 
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
 
To: theFIRMbss
    The Scotts aren't badWhen the Scotts are Scots and hott.
 
6
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:29:21 AM PDT
by 
decimon
 
To: squarebarb
    Sorry, Jupiter was a Roman god. And he could spell it right I imagine. Unless the writer means Ppluto.Or Ppan.
Nitppicking.
 
7
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:30:44 AM PDT
by 
decimon
 
To: theFIRMbss
    "The Scotts aren't bad
 when they're not painting themselves
 like the Blue Man group . . ." They didn't wear kilts when the Romans were there.
 
8
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:31:38 AM PDT
by 
blam
 
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
     the lack of the Phrygian cap would seem to suggest that this figure is not Mithra himself. That was my first thought.
Mithras was a soldier's god during Roman times. It was also speculated that the historical Arthur (Arturo the Bear, yes he did exist) was a follower of Mithras.
 
9
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:37:09 AM PDT
by 
Focault's Pendulum
(I want to see Totus's birth certificate...or at least date of manufacture.)
 
To: blam
    >They didn't wear kilts when the Romans were there
 
 
  
     | 
    Anachronisms ...  Don't harsh my mellow. Bet the  go-go boots miss, too.  | 
  
 
 
To: Focault's Pendulum
    I thought Mithras was that funny character in Babylon 5 who had a brother named Mithras. :)
 
11
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:40:21 AM PDT
by 
Sudetenland
(Without God there is no freedom, for what rights man can give, he can take away.)
 
To: Sudetenland
    I thought Mithras was that funny character in Babylon 5 A descendant thrice removed.
 
12
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:43:36 AM PDT
by 
Focault's Pendulum
(I want to see Totus's birth certificate...or at least date of manufacture.)
 
To: Focault's Pendulum
    I dunno, did Mithras have to wear a cap? The standing-on-bull thing tempts one to believe this might have been a depiction of Mithras.
 
13
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:52:40 AM PDT
by 
ottbmare
(Ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Obama!)
 
To: theFIRMbss
    " Bet the go-go boots miss, too. " Yup, ha, ha.
Mel Gibson was historicaly incorrect by wearing a kilt in the movie 'Braveheart' too, but he knew it. Kilts came after the William Wallace period.
 
14
posted on 
07/25/2009 7:53:27 AM PDT
by 
blam
 
To: Focault's Pendulum; blam
    >Mithras was a soldier's god during Roman times. It was also speculated that the historical Arthur (Arturo the Bear, yes he did exist) was a follower of Mithras
 
 Mithraism was
 popular I've read among
 Roman versions of
 
 upper middle-class
 soldiers, traders, craftsmen and
 some of the elite.
 
 Does anyone know
 if conspiracy types think
 the cult has survived
 
 in the modern world?
 I've looked around the net and
 don't see many links.
To: theFIRMbss
    Some folks think it survived, minus the bull, in Christianity.
There are certainly some parallels.
 
16
posted on 
07/25/2009 8:10:25 AM PDT
by 
Terabitten
(Vets wrote a blank check, payable to the Constitution, for an amount up to and including their life.)
 
To: decimon
17
posted on 
07/25/2009 8:11:11 AM PDT
by 
Ladycalif
(Free - Ramos and  Compean)
 
To: theFIRMbss; All
    >Does anyone know if conspiracy types think the cult has survived in the modern world? 
  The reason I ask
 is the phrase "Sol Invictus"
 is 
linked to Mithras.
 
 Of course "Invictus"
 was 
Timothy McVeigh's choice for his "final words" . . .
 
To: theFIRMbss
    Is there any one
 reason that you wish to use
 haikus for your posts?
19
posted on 
07/25/2009 8:17:44 AM PDT
by 
akorahil
(Thank You and God bless all Veterans.  Truly, the real heroes.)
 
To: Sudetenland
    “I’m Larry, and this is my brother Mithras and my other brother Mithras.”
 
20
posted on 
07/25/2009 8:32:24 AM PDT
by 
Andyman
(The truth shall make you FReep.)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-36 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson