“And our founding fathers chopped down the forest of English laws meant to enslave them.”
You know, that’s just dumb. The entire argument of the Declaration is that England’s Constitution was being violated. They did not call for anarchy, did not chop down England’s laws. Their quarrel was with the King’s enforcement of the constitution and laws. They argued that certain laws (Stamp Act) were unjust because they violated constitutional law, no taxation without representation.
They upheld and obeyed and took for granted that English law would continue to apply. They were trained in English law, they appealed to English law. They simply argued that the present regime was not following the law and claimed standing as leaders under the laws of their colonies to dissolve their links to the King.
For you to say they chopped down England’s laws demonstrates you have no grasp of the issues involved in the question of Obama’s legitimacy.
Are you a subject of the king?
No and why?
Because our founding fathers decided that the King’s laws should not apply to us, in reality using Moore’s argument they had to cut down the forest to plant their own trees.
And they included in their new forest those tool necessary to ensure that should any tree within it become diseased or a sanctuary for the devil we had the means to chop it down and plant anew.