No, that is not the question. The issue was never formally dealt with in a court and it has yet to be conclusively proven that Arthur was indeed usurping the Constitutional requirements. You seem to want to cover for that lying bastard in the Ovala Office until his term has expired. The question is in regards to the sitting entity in the position of Pres__ent.
See post #175..., I think he was calling you a troll.... LOL...