[dmz]

I don’t pay much attention to film critics in general, less so when they admit up front that they have not seen it.

It strains the critics credibility (IMHO) when, having not seen the film, he states that it is “A film which plumbs new depths of sexual explicitness, excruciating violence and degradation”

Wouldn’t you need to see the movie to state that?

[BenLurkin]

He claims to have read the script — but that can't fully deliver unforgettable brain poisoning imagery.