Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: frankenMonkey
The research on his mother's side is actually quite extensive and can be found here. The research on his Daddy's side, what little is available, is also at www.wargs.com.
3 posted on 07/21/2009 7:50:19 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

I am most pleased to note that although one branch of my family has been in the U.S.A. since 1640 (MA, Martha’s Vineyard), NONE of the names I am familiar with from my family tree are mentioned on THAT family tree.

I am blessed.


6 posted on 07/21/2009 7:58:25 AM PDT by madison10 (Prayer is what is remains when we run out of options...when it should have been the first choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman
Barack Hussein Obama II, U.S. Senator from Illinois, U.S. President from 2009, b. Kapiolani Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, 4 Aug. 1961,

If the very first line is false, then what can you say about the rest?

8 posted on 07/21/2009 8:17:03 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman
The research on his mother's side is actually quite extensive and can be found here. The research on his Daddy's side, what little is available, is also at www.wargs.com.

Maybe, but the point is we can't 100% be positive Stanley was Obama's mother or that Obama Sr. was his father, without a primary source document.

I am a genealogist myself and you need to first verify through a primary source (birth certificate, baptism record, etc. etc.) an individuals direct parentage and place of birth before proceeding any further with a 'lineage'. If that can't be done there is no authoritative tree.

What Obama posted is not a credible primary source document as it is a computer image not a paper document that can be examined for authenticity. Add to that the very likely reality that it is a forgery makes it even less authoritative.

In my opinion the Mormons should know this. So they really, really, REALLY screwed up on this one. Now all their credibility on matters of genealogy just went out the window.

10 posted on 07/21/2009 8:18:09 AM PDT by conservativegramma ((No taxation without constitutional representation!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson