To: calex59
Whoa! 1961 ‘Vette?
(It’s only now they can finally afford one.)
;^)
6 posted on
07/19/2009 3:34:40 PM PDT by
elcid1970
("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!")
To: elcid1970
I don’t think so. That;s not a 61.
7 posted on
07/19/2009 3:38:33 PM PDT by
anton
To: elcid1970; anton
The '56 & '57 looked the same.


9 posted on
07/19/2009 3:57:44 PM PDT by
Daffynition
("If any of you die, can I please have your ammo?" ~ Gator113)
To: elcid1970
If I remember correctly, and I hope I do, the 61 and 62 looked quite a bit differently than that one. I would say about a 56 or so.
You know what really pi**es me off? On the history channel the call American cars by the year they are produced. In other words if a car was built in 1953 they say it is a 53, well we know it was a 54 don't we? Just a little gripe but one I wanted to express!
10 posted on
07/19/2009 4:01:22 PM PDT by
calex59
(I, me, myself, am actually Jim Thompson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson