Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59

Whoa! 1961 ‘Vette?

(It’s only now they can finally afford one.)

;^)


6 posted on 07/19/2009 3:34:40 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: elcid1970

I don’t think so. That;s not a 61.


7 posted on 07/19/2009 3:38:33 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: elcid1970; anton
The '56 & '57 looked the same.


9 posted on 07/19/2009 3:57:44 PM PDT by Daffynition ("If any of you die, can I please have your ammo?" ~ Gator113)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: elcid1970
If I remember correctly, and I hope I do, the 61 and 62 looked quite a bit differently than that one. I would say about a 56 or so.

You know what really pi**es me off? On the history channel the call American cars by the year they are produced. In other words if a car was built in 1953 they say it is a 53, well we know it was a 54 don't we? Just a little gripe but one I wanted to express!

10 posted on 07/19/2009 4:01:22 PM PDT by calex59 (I, me, myself, am actually Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson