Posted on 07/19/2009 3:06:04 PM PDT by JoeProBono
I do think the 57 had a solid lens over the entire tail light housing, whereas the 56 is the partial red plastic lens as shown in the photo. The solid lends was then continued for a few years. I think until the radical styling change in 61.
In any event ...beautiful cars!
Yea, on inspection, you are right. The solid cover appears in 58-60. And, the sources for lenses call for the same lens for 56-57. I was no expert on this anyway, but I did have a 61 and I knew that call was not right on that as soon as I saw it. These were great cars. Too bad they are so expensive today. I had 5 Corvettes and wish I had every one of them back today. They would make a nice collection.
Well, you were right too! The initial call on the image being a ‘61 was off. I think I washed and waxed that *56 baby* often enough to at least recall that detail. :D
Fun cars. I too, would love to have all the two-seaters I have owned over the years. Ah life. They would have needed their own pit-crews to maintain them. Which is why I can live vicariously through the likes of Jay Leno.
“In less enlightened times, the best way to impress women was to own a hot car. But women wised up and realized it was better to buy their own hot cars so they wouldn’t have to ride around with jerks.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.