But if the document never existed, in fact only an electronic image which is being scrubbed from the servers, then does an electronic image constitute a "government document" even though there never was one?
Granted the image was fraudulent, but we are back to the Clintonian definition of "is" here, and his lawyers will use that as a defense. Proving he had anything to do with the production of that image will be much harder than the stain on the dress, and the Perjury and Obstruction of Justice in that instance were 'reduced' in the public psyche to mere philandering.
Lackeys will be well paid to take the fall, and will likely be pardoned.
I believe that it would be difficult for Obama to prove that he didn’t know about the alleged forged COLB.