Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
I'll say it right now: The woman had no business having children in her 60's.

Your question is just peculiar. Why would it be "heroic" in such an instance? I do think it's heroic when a pregnant woman finds out she has cancer and puts off treatment until after the birth of the child.

8 posted on 07/16/2009 10:44:53 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou
I do think it's heroic when a pregnant woman finds out she has cancer and puts off treatment until after the birth of the child.

I was talking about women who have already had cancer, and THEN proceed to get pregnant (often when they already have children), knowing it's more likely than not that they'll die before the child finishes elementary school. Most FReepers would think that was just fine, but then say it's obviously "selfish" when a very healthy 66 year old (who could pass for 55 to physicians), who actually has a longer life expectancy than the thirty-something woman with a history of breast cancer, decides to have a baby.

10 posted on 07/16/2009 10:51:47 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Vote for a short Freepathon! Donate now if you possibly can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson