Actually that wasn’t intended for you but was to MHGinTN.
I didn’t care for his patronizing or condescending tone. Or his marginal attempt to school me in my questions and lead me around the discussion with and by his questions.
Asking about the lawyer statement is a direct and narrow line of questioning. It is a good question but, my question dealt with the broader possibility of anyone else representing Obama’s position, with ties or responsibility for doing so, making a similar statement. That of course leads to the next question “On what basis”.
The follow up to that would be “why didn’t the judge ask what would be embarrassing?” and “Let’s see it in chambers”.
Anyway, MHGinTN was the third person to address me in this manner, this morning and I don’t care for it.
Etiquette: It is how you treat people that way you would want to be treated. Without making to much noise.
If you can’t be polite, then at some point you have to expect a rather acerbic or forceful response
I included you on the response because MHGinTN had included you in previous post.
Awww, does someone need a cookie?
Anyway, MHGinTN was the third person to address me in this manner, this morning and I don’t care for it.
______________
Welcome to the club.