Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

“So many questions...so few answers.”

Got that right !

Why were the US attorneys there ? I am going to assume that Dr. Taitz filed a “return of service” that the defendant Obama had been served through the US DOJ. If that is the case, regardless of flaws in service such as may have existed, the US Attorneys would be listed as parties to be noticed until the service issue was resolved. They would be copied on everything filed in the case, and would have received notice to attend the hearing.

I’m tempted to look up the case at PACER and print out the docket sheet and some of the case activity. But what I really want to see is the transcript of yesterday’s hearing. Transcripts are typically not posted in the court’s records, so hopefully Dr. Taitz or some intrepid reporter orders it and puts it online to clarify what actually went on yesterday.


516 posted on 07/14/2009 3:20:18 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

Looked at the docket sheet earlier nothing was there then.

Orley’s paper work was put up on FR earlier...I’ll ping you to it, if you wish.

Would love to see the transcipt (give to dad) if you find it ping me to it.


528 posted on 07/14/2009 4:12:01 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson