To: Daffynition
If they're going to kill them anyway, why don't they just take like 20% of them, kill them, butcher them, and auction them off to exotic-food eaters?
The proceeds may actually save the zoo and the other 80% of the other animals.
Oh, but wait. That may lead them to continue this practice. And that would be like farming, which would be capitalizing on their assets.
No. Better just kill them all and bury them. That's the socialist way.
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
This is just a bunch of posturing, I suspect they hope to garner enough public sympathy and outrage to have a last-minute reprieve.
5 posted on
07/11/2009 11:11:27 AM PDT by
Daffynition
("If any of you die, can I please have your ammo?" ~ Gator113)
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
If they're going to kill them anyway, why don't they just take like 20% of them, kill them, butcher them, and auction them off to exotic-food eaters?You read my mind.
21 posted on
07/11/2009 11:36:36 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(The University of Notre Dame's motto: "Kill our unborn children? YES WE CAN!")
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
They are going to kill the animals in the zoo because they have no funding.....however, I bet they still have funding to kill the babies in the womb.
Liberalism on display.
23 posted on
07/11/2009 11:41:32 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson