Since you think that he has debunked evolution, why don't you point out his best falsification of it?
I have 4 simple questions that you might ponder regarding evolution. So far none of the FR erudite evolutionary scholars have bothered to answer even one of these...
1. What is the evolutionary explanation for stasis in the fossil record?
2. What is the evolutionary explanation for polystrate fossils?
3. Since no biological clocks can be assured of 100% accuracy, why does evolutionary science completely discard the hundred or so other younger biological, geological, and astronomical clocks in favor of only a very few indicating billions of years for earth and universe?
4. What was it that Darwin himself said would absolutely cause his theory of evolution to fall apart? Personally I think the quote from Darwin is the best evidence against evolution but you’ll have to do your own digging to see what he said.
Once you realize the folly in trying to explain these 4 simple questions above you might try moving on to all that is presented at creationscience.com.
Lastly Kansas58 you might try researching a little about the science that the Bible has made clear. One of the best examples is the water cycle. Another is man made from dust. Then there’s the health benefits for moderate wine consumption - not found with any other type of alcohol. Or how about the eery parallels between Genesis and the big bang theory?
Anyway your argument is a strawman at best. The Bible is intended to show us the truth about our present fallen state and lead us to saving faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. Any truths presented there about science simply show that God’s wisdom and knowledge will always surpass the conclusions reached by mere mortal men. If you really think you can debunk the Bible then please start by giving us your studied opinion of Psalm 22 written hundreds of years before Christ’ time on earth.