Posted on 07/10/2009 3:22:39 PM PDT by rxsid
No I am not discussing this with somebody else except with you, and here is what I am getting out of Honduras as a contradiction to what you are calling a military coup, so what do you think? Hmmm!
Background on the referendum, which Zelaya insisted on in spite of it having been declared unlawful: * When the armed forces refused to distribute the ballots, Zelaya fired the chief of the armed forces, Gen. Romeo Vásquez, and the defense minister, the head of the army and the air force resigned in protest. * Yesterday the Supreme Court ordered by a 5-0 vote that Vásquez be reinstated. * Honduras’s Supreme Electoral Tribunal ordered authorities to pick up all the ballots and electoral material, which were held by the country’s air force. * The country’s Attorney General requested yesterday that Congress oust Zelaya. * The courts have declared the referendum unlawful. Last Tuesday the Congress passed a law preventing the holding of referendums or plebiscites 180 days before or after general elections. Congress has also named a commission to investigate Zelaya.
This lying bastard of a usurper and his beatnik mom were scamming the Social Security system. He was hard up for dough before Sugar Daddy Soros and Arab/foreign money came along.
Under the UCMJ, that's grounds for prosecution. (Insubordination).
My ass is being deployed by this. Sure walks, talks, and quacks like a declaration of war.
White House won't confirm Obama's 'birth letter' exists
Spokesman belittles WND reporter, asks 'what reporting' has been done.
"The issue arose today when Les Kinsolving, WND's correspondent at the White House, asked Gibbs about the letter, which the hospital also used in a magazine fundraising article.
...
Gibbs' answer came in response to Kinsolving's question:
While you and the president were overseas on July the 7th, there was on the Internet a copy of a letter on White House letterhead dated January the 24th, 2009, with the signature "Barack Obama," which stated, "The place of my birth was Honolulu's Kapi'olani Medical Center." And my question is, can you verify this letter? Or if not, would you tell us which Hawaiian hospital he was born in, since Kapi'olani, which used to publicize this, now refuses to confirm?
Gibbs said, without responding directly to the question about the veracity of the letter, "Goodness gracious. I'm going to be, like, in year four describing where it is the president was born. I don't have the letter at my fingertips, obviously, and I don't know the name of the exact hospital."
...
When Kinsolving asked when Gibbs could check, he responded.
"I will seek to interview whoever brought the president into this world. But can we just – I want to do this once and for all, Lester. Let's just do this once and for all. You can go on this – I hope you'll take the time not just to Google 'President, January 24, Hawaii hospital, birth' and come up with this letter, but go on the Internet and get the birth certificate, Lester, and put…"
When Kinsolving pointed at that the image posted on various website's was not been a birth certificate or a certificate of live birth, but a different "Certification of Live Birth" document, Gibbs said, "I know. Just a document from the state of Hawaii denoting the fact that the president was indeed born in the state of Hawaii.
...
more:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103898
In reference to post #228:
"News sites swap Obama's birthplace like magic UPI, Snopes change location within hours of WND report"
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103465
"Obama's 'birth hospital' in astonishing cover-up Once proudly celebrated president, now in active mode to hide 'proof'
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103633
What a joke that 'administration' is.
So has the Macon Ledger-enquirer:
Soldier balks at deployment; says Obama isn’t really president
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/breaking_news/story/776335.html
Both articles/sites appear to have a comment section.
CASE NAME CORRECTION KEYES V. OBAMA (Not Keyes v. Bowen)
Major Cook just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on procedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CIC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualified he needs to leave the White House.
The DOJ will be involved with the case also.... It wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.
Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.
Orly, asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.
Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter. Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.
More will be posted as I learn more. God Bless Major Cook!
The U.S. Constitution provides for military operations under both war and other contingencies. There is a clear recognition of reprisal and permission to seize assets.
The U.S. Congress has updated those other contingencies for our era in a War Powers Act of a number of years ago. That has never been challenged in court, and I doubt Scotus would see differently than Congress that it can engage in other military operations besides all-out war.
America, of course, wants that to be so. Some offenses require a response other than all-out war, and I want Congress to have the flexibility to pursue those.
For the record:
1. I wish WAR had been declared in this instance that we "call" the "War on Terrorism."
2. Congress authorized acts against anyone in any way connected to 9/11 on 9/18/2001. They all authorized a specific action against Iraq in 2002, I believe. (I'd have to check the date on that.) The first vote was unanimous less a few, iirc. The 2nd nearly the same.
3. I am neither a lawyer nor the son of a lawyer. (But I did read the U.S. Constitution for comprehension last night at a Holiday Inn Express.)
Praying for them and their safety and the country.
bttt
Giddy up...
I just received this via E-Mail:
Dr. Orly being interviewed by LA Times re; her good news about hearing today From abc| 07/13/2009 6:28:54 PM PDT read
______________
Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits Please distribute everywhere. Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama. At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified Potus/cinc.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.
http://www.plainsradio.com/radio.html
Is this Ed Hale saying this stuff?
If your not on the ping list it’s amust see judge will hear Obama case on it’s merits.
I found this news story that just came out on the Obama court case (Lightfoot vs. Bowen):
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103918
It’s SHOWTIME!!
Praise the Lord!
With no insinuation about the merits of this case against Obama, I do believe it’s in the best interests of the U.S. for there to be some body (Justice Department) that receives and displays the proof by any candidate for any federal level office that has qualifications mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. While the U.S. Constitution mentions the qualifications, it does not mention a process whereby candidates must prove their meeting those qualifications.
This was an issue that touched on Obama, McCain, and it was mentioned in regard to Romney’s father, iirc. They are not the first to have the issue arise.
There should be a clear, specific law that gives some office the responsibility to both verify and to publicize candidate’s constitutional qualifications.
Rush, fox etc email and ask them to verify and report.
oh..don’t worry...it’s coming. Apparently the LA Times interviewed Dr. Orly today.
Please read post #307. Those words are exactly what I received in email from Major Cook.
Only the last sentence is mine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.