Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federer Stands Alone
The Washington Post ^ | July 5, 2009 | Liz Clarke

Posted on 07/05/2009 3:27:59 PM PDT by EdnaMode

Federer Stands Alone

By Liz Clarke Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, July 5, 2009; 5:08 PM WIMBLEDON, England, July 5 -- It was a day for making history.

Roger Federer, who was reduced to tears after losing last year's Wimbledon final, exulted on the same patch of Centre Court Sunday after winning his 15th Grand Slam title -- one that breaks his tie with Pete Sampras for the most career majors.

Federer prevailed in the longest Grand Slam final in men's history, turning back a determined challenge by American Andy Roddick, 5-7, 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5), 3-6, 16-14.

With the victory, which took 4 hours 18 minutes, Federer claimed his sixth Wimbledon title and reclaimed the No. 1 ranking he lost to Spain's Rafael Nadal last August.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: federer; rogerfederer; sampras; wimbledon
Amazing win over Andy Roddick who played the best match of his career,
1 posted on 07/05/2009 3:27:59 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Two great finals in a row.


2 posted on 07/05/2009 3:28:38 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Andy is playing the best tennis of his career. I think he wins another US Open. Roger is just the best ever.


3 posted on 07/05/2009 3:31:45 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Great match.

Incredibly arrogant questions by reporters after the match.

“How does it feel to lose to the best tennis player in the world?”

“Do you feel like a winner or a loser?”

“Why didn’t you win?”

How about simple good sportsmanship,

Good job to the both of them.


4 posted on 07/05/2009 3:33:42 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Yeah those were LAME questions!


5 posted on 07/05/2009 3:35:21 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Agreed. I think Roddick will either win at the US Open or in Australia in January.


6 posted on 07/05/2009 3:35:55 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Can’t believe they managed to come up with a final this good after the one last year.


7 posted on 07/05/2009 3:36:24 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Absolutely epic match. Roddick left everything on the court and lost in an unbelievable match to the greatest player ever. He looked like he was trying so hard to keep it together after the match was over. He earned a tremendous amount of respect for the way he played today.


8 posted on 07/05/2009 3:43:41 PM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Hey, did anyone notice that the guys didn't scream every time they hit the ball?

I did not watch the Ladies Final because I did not want to hear the screeching.

9 posted on 07/05/2009 3:58:41 PM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

Indeed he did. I will be rooting for him in the upcoming US Open.


10 posted on 07/05/2009 3:59:32 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
Can’t believe they managed to come up with a final this good after the one last year.

I don't know. I'm not a big tennis fan. But I caught all the extra games of the last set, and found it quite predictable, almost dull if not for the historic nature of Federer's achievement. There wasn't the slightest doubt in my mind that Roddick would never break and eventually Federer would, whether it took 20 games or 60. Maybe they need to put tighter limits on the equipment. Am I wrong in observing that the combination of equipment and player improvements has lead to a men's game where service breaks are quite rare with closely matched competitors? And a game where serve is almost always held is a game with few long points and a boring game to watch, especially for the casual fan. I'm sure there was something in this match for the tennis enthusiasts who marvel at ace after ace, but there was no Conners/Lendl diarrhea match type drama.

11 posted on 07/05/2009 5:59:06 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

“Amazing win over Andy Roddick who played the best match of his career

I think Roddick was a bit better against Murray.

Federer is a great tennis player, but until he wins a calendar-year grand slam I wouldn’t rate him higher than Rod Laver, who did it twice (1962 and 1969).


12 posted on 07/05/2009 6:32:46 PM PDT by devere (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devere

Then again, when Laver won those Slams, 3 of the 4 were on grass. So I think it’s really hard to compare those two eras.


13 posted on 07/05/2009 7:18:30 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
IIRC the issue with Laver was that he turned pro and for 6-7 years or so the pros were banned from the slam tournaments. He would have won more slams.

That said, Federer seems to me to be the greatest of all-time and he's got some more wins coming.

14 posted on 07/05/2009 7:24:25 PM PDT by nufsed (. Stay away and I'll stay here. What else needs to be siad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

“So I think it’s really hard to compare those two eras.”

They also played with wooden rackets, although I think Federer would be even better with wood. He’s an artist with a racket, just like Laver was.

It’s really a shame they can’t just go back to wooden rackets. Imagine Major League baseball played with metal bats, and that’s about what tennis is like now.


15 posted on 07/05/2009 7:26:22 PM PDT by devere (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: devere

Yeah Federer would be successful with wood and his racquet is much smaller and heavier than most of his contemporaries.


16 posted on 07/05/2009 7:53:39 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Great point you bring up. I can’t stand the screaming either. The loud stuff should be banned.


17 posted on 07/05/2009 9:32:54 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Minn

Roddick broke Federer’s serve twice before the fifth set.

Federer only broke Roddick’s serve once - in the fifth set which won it for him because he was serving first that set. In addition Roddick had two break points on Federer’s serve in the fifth set but failed to convert.

Only a fool would say there “was no doubt in my mind that Roddick would never break” Federer’s serve in the fifth set.


18 posted on 07/05/2009 10:14:08 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
The loud stuff should be banned.

The WTA is out to lunch on this issue.

19 posted on 07/05/2009 11:17:58 PM PDT by period end of story (Give me a firm spot, and I will move the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson