Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer; Polarik; pissant; BP2; SatinDoll; LucyT; Calpernia; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Candor7; ...
The basic facts in this article were posted here on FR months ago.

As others have reported here on FR, the Obama "birth announcement" seems to have been forged and grafted onto the original newspaper copy at a later date. The fact that there is no evidence that the Obamas ever lived at the address indicated in the "birth announcement" is further evidence strongly suggesting that the birth announcement is a fake.

309 posted on 07/07/2009 1:24:34 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93

Obama’s alleged forged COLB, forged Selective Service document, forged newspaper birth announcment, conflicting birth locations?? I DEMAND THAT THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE INVESTIGATE Obama!!

You wrote: “As others have reported here on FR, the Obama “birth announcement” seems to have been forged and grafted onto the original newspaper copy at a later date. The fact that there is no evidence that the Obamas ever lived at the address indicated in the “birth announcement” is further evidence strongly suggesting that the birth announcement is a fake.”


311 posted on 07/07/2009 2:40:25 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93; Polarik; pissant; BP2; SatinDoll; LucyT; Calpernia; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; ...

The basic facts in this article were posted here on FR months ago.

As others have reported here on FR, the Obama “birth announcement” seems to have been forged and grafted onto the original newspaper copy at a later date. The fact that there is no evidence that the Obamas ever lived at the address indicated in the “birth announcement” is further evidence strongly suggesting that the birth announcement is a fake.
///////////

Could someone do a post that provides a little more detail and clarity as to why that newspaper clipping was a fraud?

what I saw was very unclear. i could not see from what was online how the news article had been forged. I saw the explanations beside the news columns but what I saw in the news column didn’t reflect the explanation of forgery in the way that the close ups of obama’s online “certification of live birth” showed that that thing was a forgery.

it would be helpful too to have some kind of plausible outline of how they could have done it. and whether or not anyone but the obots have retrieved the microfilmed files. for example a microfilm that’s been tampered with in the last year should have some characteristics that are very different from a 40 year old microfilm that hasn’t been tampered with.


317 posted on 07/07/2009 11:53:38 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson