Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil
"No, the type of forgery issue that I read about was in print form. It appears they later found the actual microfilm." Source please ... I have yet to see anything but a purported microfiche sent by a netizen to atlas_shrugs, IIRC.

BTW, images on micro are now stored on sheet negatives, not rolls.

279 posted on 07/06/2009 5:01:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

I am sorry, I will have to see if I can still find the source again. Was going by memory, and at 61 that is dangerous. My memory for my age is pretty good, but we all get slower with age.

I noticed yesterday when I tried to look up documents relating to the birth announcement that some of the ones I had seen before were no longer there. Page could not be found. From that I concluded that the discussion related to forging “copies of copies” from an old paper, was circumvented by finding the actual Microfilm (I assumed rolls circa 1961).

There have been a lot of “stuff” magic away on the web in the past 6 months, most of what I see missing seems to be related to the Dem’s hiding the puck.

Will look to see if I can still find some reference to the discussion.


281 posted on 07/06/2009 5:09:41 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson