The Honorable John Jay UNDERLINED what he thought was
important so that you, more than a century later,
could see it.
The Criminals in Black Robes have robbed Americans.
>The Honorable John Jay UNDERLINED what he thought was important so that you, more than a century later, could see it.
Yes, but ‘seeing’ it doesn’t mean that I can read it. (IE maybe my bad eyes, or the script, other factors, or some combination thereof.)
>The Criminals in Black Robes have robbed Americans.
On this we can and do agree. Examples:
— The 25Jun05 decision legitimizing theft and larceny under the governmental-approval of Immanent Domain.
— The refusal to hear allegations against Pr Obama’s eligibility; they could shut everyone up on the matter by doing things by-the-book and verifying his status as a Natural Born Citizen.
— The refusal to hear the complaints of GM/Chrysler bondholders against the unilateral actions of the Executive branch breaching the contracts backing the bonds themselves.
— The refusal to strike down Bills not read, as in the TARP bill or the Cap & Trade bill; how can the Legislature do their job, Constitutionally speaking, if they have not even read the bill on which they vote (and pass)?
And, salt in the wound, what of John Murtha’s on-record actions convicting & condemning Marines in a warzone w/o trial? How much more do you have to do to give aid & comfort to the enemy? Or do we ignore that part and think only of actively waging war on the US as treason?