No. That was a disinformation story put out to cloud the waters after people realized his father was Frank Marshall Davis.
Considering there has been no hard evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was in Hawaii after her graduation in the summer of 1960 until she showed up with an approx two or three year old child...how she could become pregnant to a man born in 1905, making him 55 years of age in 1960...makes that theory of paternity difficult for me to believe.
Well, if you’re talking about the July 18th birthday, I don’t buy it, period. I had another witness to this July 18 date, but I guess that I didn’t save it. It was on Free Republic too. Someone happened to say that they saw BO’s birthdate in an African journal of 7/18/1961 instead of the 8/4/61 date and this was way before he was elected as POTUS.
I know that his real father could be Malcolm X, Frank Davis and maybe BO, Sr. just said on his BC that he was the father. Whoever is on the BC is the one who they will go by with the birth certificate just like an adopted child. He will inherit his father’s citizenship too even if they are not actual blood.
So I don’t understand how anyone can think this 7/18/61 date is unimportant. Just like everything else about him, even his b-day that he’s told everyone may be false. It’s like, will the real person please take a stand!
And perhaps for those who in the past have been checking for his records are using a false birthday date. That would truly make things difficult to find.
I fail to see any resemblance to FMD.