He never said that whatsoever, stop grandstanding. It was just an animal as he said and that jail term is outrageous IMHO. People like you give ammo to those that scream against hunting. He should of just filed a complaint with the city, then had the animal either locked up or it's head cut off for a rabies check.
> He never said that whatsoever, stop grandstanding.
No, let’s be precise: he said that I was crazy (for believing a 10 year sentence w/o parole was more appropriate) and that it was only an animal not a human. As if that makes a dam’n bit of difference: subhuman behavior is subhuman behavior no matter what its victim happens to be.
His previous post showed that he didn’t believe the act even warranted a maximum of five years sentence.
Perhaps you should stop grandstanding instead.
> It was just an animal as he said and that jail term is outrageous IMHO.
Outrageously short IMHO. It was more than “just” an animal, it was somebody’s pet: a domestic cat, to be precise.
> People like you give ammo to those that scream against hunting.
What a perfectly idiotic thing to say. As if hunters would stoop so low as to beat a cat to death in front of kids.
> He should of just filed a complaint with the city, then had the animal either locked up or it’s head cut off for a rabies check.
Yup, that’s the law. And assuming that the Animal Control Officer could stop his arse from falling off while he was rolling on the floor laughing at the complainant, that is what should have been done.
Beating a domestic cat to death in front of kids? Do you think that was the appropriate thing to do here?
If so, you’re a sicko too
If not, then what legal sanction do you believe appropriate?