Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rodebrecht

Doesn’t say much, because if a state has more national parks, it automatically will have more of its land come under Federal authority. Alaska seems like a case of that, exactly.


2 posted on 07/01/2009 3:00:59 AM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MyTwoCopperCoins
. . . if a state has more national parks, it automatically will have more of its land come under Federal authority

Good point. Add to that the idea that beyond the 13 colonies, much of the land came into U.S. possession as government-owned land (acquired from Britain, France, Mexico, or Native Americans). A large portion of that was sold to speculators who divided it into parcels to be sold to settlers.

If you look at the arable lands, you get a feel for where the most-desired land for settlers was located -- less government-owned land resulted in more purchase of government lands for farming or mining. The map tends to support that.

8 posted on 07/01/2009 3:49:06 AM PDT by Quiller (When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

The feds own way more that national parks in the west.


11 posted on 07/01/2009 4:26:28 AM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson