Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen Sails Into Miss England Final Wearing The Same Dress Her Grandma Was Modelling In 1966
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | June 28, 2009

Posted on 06/28/2009 7:31:01 PM PDT by Steelfish

Teen sails into Miss England final wearing the same dress her grandma was modelling in 1966

By ADAM DAWE

29th June 2009

Recycled: Miss England finalist Katy Baxter in her grandmother's dress [Pic in URL]

It was a stunning dress back in 1966. And in 2009, it's still a winner.

The silver frock first worn by Katy Baxter's granny has helped the teenager through to the finals of Miss England.

Katy, 18, had to wear something 'recycled' for her semi-final against 57 other girls a fortnight ago.

She said: 'You could wear an old dress or make up something yourself from old crisp packets, as one girl did.

'My mother had just had Gran's old dress dry-cleaned two weeks earlier and she suggested that I tried it on. It fitted perfectly and I absolutely loved it.'

The lurex frock was worn by Margaret Sloman, now 76, while she was modelling at a motocross event in Kent.

Mrs Sloman, who lives in Exeter, bought the dress in either France or Italy during a summer holiday. Her daughter - Katy's mother - Julia Baxter said: 'My mother is absolutely delighted that the dress has come to life after all these years.'

The Miss England final is taking place in London next month.

Meanwhile Katy, from Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, is awaiting her exam results to see if she has the grades to study business management at Exeter University.

She also is holding a series of local fundraisers for the pageant's three nominated charities, B-eat, the National Autistic Society, and the Variety Club of Great Britain.

Supporters can donate via www. giftshare.com/katybaxter.

The winner goes on to contest the Miss World crown in South Africa at the end of the year.

[Pic in URL] Brand new: Katy's granny in the frock in 1966

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: katybaxter; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Robert A. Cook, PE; netmilsmom

I agree about the shoes - the dress is simple and elegant and the shoes should have been open and strappy - very delicate -


41 posted on 06/28/2009 9:11:33 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Michael J had to go to therapy when he realized "Boys To Men" was a band and not a delivery service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

As much as women pay for clothes, they should wear them for a couple generations.


42 posted on 06/28/2009 9:12:16 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finny

In 1966, a girl would most likely wear white or silver go-go boots with that dress.


43 posted on 06/28/2009 9:17:18 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tioga; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Laura Earl; Slip18; Gabz; xsmommy; secret garden; sweetliberty; ...
More appropriate shoes would have been refined-line high-heeled sandals of a similar hue to the dress.

See!

Exactly what I said above! Slightly lower, open-toed and with straps are great, silver or silver-grey .... A little bit thicker heels - the ones she has are too narrow and “tippy” looking. Unbalanced.

Low cut sandals? Nope.
Boots? (Or some other 60’s rip-off/copy-cat) Of course not.

44 posted on 06/28/2009 9:39:45 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
I had to scroll back up and look at the picture again. Shoes? She's wearing shoes??? Who knew?
45 posted on 06/28/2009 9:55:18 PM PDT by TrueKnightGalahad (When you're racing...it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Smokin’ hot granny dress.
46 posted on 06/29/2009 12:50:48 AM PDT by Cheburashka (There is an unlimited supply of stupid, although a lot of people are trying to use it all up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exist
Holy crap that chick would look hot in a Burqa. If I was married to her I would put her in one.

I doubt she'd let you.

47 posted on 06/29/2009 12:55:41 AM PDT by Allegra ( Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Robert A. Cook, PE; tioga

i also agree about the shoes, but the bigger issue is, why in the WORLD is robt on this thread contemplating the proper footwear for this dress????


48 posted on 06/29/2009 3:10:43 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

The only thing that makes the dress look dated is the fact that it isn’t skin tight on her. Today, most girls would have the dress 2 sizes smaller so that it was pulled tight to her figure.


49 posted on 06/29/2009 3:20:23 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

“Star Trek” uniform.


50 posted on 06/29/2009 4:59:12 AM PDT by Tax-chick (O hai. Do I need you for something right now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Finny

You are right. I wasn’t old enough in the 60s and 70s to be wearing heels of any style. I was still wearing my urrgly school uniform shoes. But I went back and looked at pictures of what my older relatives were wearing, and the clunky heels came later, as you said, in the 70s. It would have been, like you said, a spike heel, squarish, or perhaps even a pointed-toe, kitten heel shoe. But where are you finding the clunky heels? The last nice, work appropriate pair I have I bought in the late 90s. Now all I am finding are ballet flats, wedges, platforms or spikes like in the pictures at the link I posted above. Even my beloved Stuart Weitzman is fresh out.


51 posted on 06/29/2009 5:24:15 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
It was an ugly sack in the 60’s and it is an ugly sack now. pretty girl tho’.
52 posted on 06/29/2009 5:26:37 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

>>It was an ugly sack in the 60’s and it is an ugly sack now. pretty girl tho’. <<

Although it looks like a sack, sometimes simplicity brings out the beauty of the wearer.


53 posted on 06/29/2009 5:30:31 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

The legs do though.


54 posted on 06/29/2009 5:33:24 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
It was called a sack dress in the 60’s. Simplicity is good, complete shapelessness is not. It is also completely devoid of color.
55 posted on 06/29/2009 5:33:55 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

>>In 1966, a girl would most likely wear white or silver go-go boots with that dress.<<

YOU PEGGED IT!
Think 99 from Get Smart.
Go-go boots and cropped hair. Or a huge updo with large earrings.

That is 1966. I was 5 and remember looking at the teenagers next door dressing like that.


56 posted on 06/29/2009 5:35:17 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I agree with you that it is shapeless and devoid of color, but that part of the contest was to use "recycle" something. It could have been this....

Yuck.

57 posted on 06/29/2009 5:38:18 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

You said “yuck” but I prefer this one on a cute young girl to the first one. I didn’t know they were supposed to recycle.

In the 60’s I had a bright orange sack dress with little cap sleeves that was OK on me at the time. When I think back on it, it was pretty bad and orange wasn’t a good color for me. LOL!


58 posted on 06/29/2009 5:45:31 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

>>and orange wasn’t a good color for me. LOL!<<

Truth be told! Unless you have a darker skin hue, orange is not a good color.

Mustard and orange for black girls looks great!


59 posted on 06/29/2009 5:49:19 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

The hetero guys don’t even notice she’s wearing shoes.


60 posted on 06/29/2009 5:52:03 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson