Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen Sails Into Miss England Final Wearing The Same Dress Her Grandma Was Modelling In 1966
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | June 28, 2009

Posted on 06/28/2009 7:31:01 PM PDT by Steelfish

Teen sails into Miss England final wearing the same dress her grandma was modelling in 1966

By ADAM DAWE

29th June 2009

Recycled: Miss England finalist Katy Baxter in her grandmother's dress [Pic in URL]

It was a stunning dress back in 1966. And in 2009, it's still a winner.

The silver frock first worn by Katy Baxter's granny has helped the teenager through to the finals of Miss England.

Katy, 18, had to wear something 'recycled' for her semi-final against 57 other girls a fortnight ago.

She said: 'You could wear an old dress or make up something yourself from old crisp packets, as one girl did.

'My mother had just had Gran's old dress dry-cleaned two weeks earlier and she suggested that I tried it on. It fitted perfectly and I absolutely loved it.'

The lurex frock was worn by Margaret Sloman, now 76, while she was modelling at a motocross event in Kent.

Mrs Sloman, who lives in Exeter, bought the dress in either France or Italy during a summer holiday. Her daughter - Katy's mother - Julia Baxter said: 'My mother is absolutely delighted that the dress has come to life after all these years.'

The Miss England final is taking place in London next month.

Meanwhile Katy, from Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, is awaiting her exam results to see if she has the grades to study business management at Exeter University.

She also is holding a series of local fundraisers for the pageant's three nominated charities, B-eat, the National Autistic Society, and the Variety Club of Great Britain.

Supporters can donate via www. giftshare.com/katybaxter.

The winner goes on to contest the Miss World crown in South Africa at the end of the year.

[Pic in URL] Brand new: Katy's granny in the frock in 1966

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: katybaxter; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: netmilsmom

Here is another picture of Katy in the dress.

21 posted on 06/28/2009 8:07:54 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Seriously, it was probably all she could find to buy in the stores. That dress was probably worn with a clunky heel, but they're difficult to locate. All the shoes for fall look like these, which I will no doubt break my ankle wearing:

http://www.neimanmarcus.com/store/catalog/templates/P6.jhtml?itemId=cat22010736&parentId=cat12310741&masterId=cat6170735&cmCat=

which is what a lot of the summer dress shoes looked like. I think they're a little S&M for daily wear.

22 posted on 06/28/2009 8:13:20 PM PDT by La Lydia (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Very pretty and wholesome looking young lady.


23 posted on 06/28/2009 8:14:31 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; xsmommy; Gabz; secret garden; tioga; Texan5; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Tax-chick
Seriously, the shoes don't go with the dress

What? Grey or silver and grey, maybe, with perhaps 1/2” or 3/4” shorter heels? Perhaps the heels would be better proportioned if they were 3/32 larger at the tip.

24 posted on 06/28/2009 8:19:52 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

She looks divine & chic. Simplicity in its finest. 60s fashion were still feminine.


25 posted on 06/28/2009 8:20:49 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Nice!


26 posted on 06/28/2009 8:22:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I do believe your calculations are about an 1/8 of an inch off.....and they look like granny shoes, just like the dress......now a nice pair of hooker shoes might work to update the look.

;^P


27 posted on 06/28/2009 8:23:43 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tioga; secret garden; Laura Earl

Hmmmn..

Appears ti & I disagree aboot shoes.


28 posted on 06/28/2009 8:26:50 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
what about these?..........

;^)....they are naughty monkeys....

29 posted on 06/28/2009 8:31:03 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I owned a dress nearly identical to that one, same color and style. Now I am trying to recall what shoes I wore with it! Possibly grey with a thicker, shorter heel.


30 posted on 06/28/2009 8:33:45 PM PDT by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Figures - men discuss her obvious pulchritude, while women discuss her...shoes. LOL!


31 posted on 06/28/2009 8:37:56 PM PDT by TrueKnightGalahad (When you're racing...it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TrueKnightGalahad

Lol! I think you may be right.


32 posted on 06/28/2009 8:39:48 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I never did comprehend the appeal of this kind of nothing “fashion.” A bath towel would be more shapely and stylish.

Grace Kelly in “Rear Window,” “High Society,” and every other movie she made. That’s clothes.


33 posted on 06/28/2009 8:42:46 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga

I wish my legs were long enough to wear a shoe like that.


34 posted on 06/28/2009 8:43:39 PM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
The shoes are wrong, and hair is wrong -- it should be lifted up or be worn short in order to emphasize the most important design elment of the dress, which is its cut at the neck and shoulders. And then she should have added long dangling earrings to emphasize it even more.

More appropriate shoes would have been refined-line high-heeled sandals of a similar hue to the dress.

35 posted on 06/28/2009 8:44:57 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

I just hope I never see them on the first lady.......(shudder)....she may have long legs.....but gees......imagine?


36 posted on 06/28/2009 8:44:59 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Seriously, the shoes don't go with the dress

Shoes?

37 posted on 06/28/2009 8:45:22 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
That dress was probably worn with a clunky heel, but they're difficult to locate.

Disagree on both counts. Here in the US, ugly clunky heels are easy to find -- all too common, in my opinion! And they were not the fasion in 1966; they didn't become fashionable until the late 60s, and, sadly, dominated in the horrific early 70s. No, in 1966, refined, light, rather elegant little strapped sandals, with either a spike heel or a very light squarish high heel, would have been the fashion. Not that she's required to wear period accessories wiht the dress, it's just that those kinds of lines would work better with the dress.

38 posted on 06/28/2009 8:49:02 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TrueKnightGalahad
Figures - men discuss her obvious pulchritude, while women discuss her...shoes. \

THAT had me laughing aloud! How TRUE!!!!!

39 posted on 06/28/2009 8:50:25 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TrueKnightGalahad
For the uneducated:

define pulchritude: physical beauty (especially of a woman)

40 posted on 06/28/2009 9:01:48 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson