To: NoobRep
Do you recall which of the Berg cases had the judge telling plaintiffs that the CoLB Internet image had been twittered, viewed, etc. so much there could be no question of authenticity? He never saw anything but the Internet forgery by which to base his ruling.
59 posted on
06/27/2009 6:49:34 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: MHGinTN
Doesn’t matter. Got a federal judge willing to go for it.Thinks its very serious.
61 posted on
06/27/2009 7:02:53 PM PDT by
taxtruth
To: MHGinTN; All
Do you recall which of the Berg cases had the judge telling plaintiffs that the CoLB Internet image had been twittered, viewed, etc. so much there could be no question of authenticity? He never saw anything but the Internet forgery by which to base his ruling. That's just crazy. That's like posting a picture of a jackalope or a merman to the Internet and having everyone view it and then claim it must be genuine since everyone's seen it.
To: MHGinTN
Do you recall which of the Berg cases had the judge telling plaintiffs that the CoLB Internet image had been twittered, viewed, etc. so much there could be no question of authenticity? He never saw anything but the Internet forgery by which to base his ruling. Technically, it wasn't his case. It was Hemenway v. Obama. You can see that quote plus a few more here :
Link
To: MHGinTN
Correction Hemenway was the attorney. The Case was Hollister v. Obama
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson