Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AFreeBird
And I think there was a similar article that said something like the old 286-12 computers had more power than the computers on the Apollo missions.
Oh hell, your digital watch has more processing power than those old Apollo IBM computers.

I didn't realize they were so low-powered - or that the digital watches had that much ooomph. Know of any equivalents or what system they used?

44 posted on 06/28/2009 6:13:09 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka; AFreeBird
And I think there was a similar article that said something like the old 286-12 computers had more power than the computers on the Apollo missions.
Oh hell, your digital watch has more processing power than those old Apollo IBM computers.

I didn't realize they were so low-powered - or that the digital watches had that much ooomph. Know of any equivalents or what system they used?

Look at the Apollo capsule interiors at the Smithsonian, Cape Canaveral, or Huntsville AL: That “computer” dead center of the three astronauts - in a capsule where 1/10 of an oz was a highly prized weight gain! - there is a four function calculator. 16 buttons. Multiple display “folded” tube lights for each number, in a box about 10x10x10. THAT was the “computer” sent into space by the best of what we had then.

52 posted on 06/28/2009 4:09:45 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson