He claims it started "innocently" emailing 8 years ago.
I guess you'd argue that what the woman looked like had nothing to do with the original relationship or his pursuing it UNTIL he was "nuts in love"?
He set himself up...and I re-assert it was because he was thinking with the "other" head.
Although its moot, I say if she'd been the proverbial dog "with a great personality", the emails that led to his going nuts wouldn't have been nearly as enticing to him...and I dare say as frequent.
Again, I'm not condemning him for anything that isn't understandable.
I'm condemning him for having the judgment of a junior high boy in puberty in terms of the absolutely ludicrous judgment he showed in hopping off on that secret tryst.
If my college age son did something like that I'd want his mental soundness evaluated for his own sake.
And my son is not running a state, in the public eye daily or being discussed as a serious candidate to run the country.
The guy has problems, and needs to deal with them in private and allow the responsible adults can do the things he was aligning himself to do before he threw it all away like a childish fool without majorly stupid lapses in judgment.
My point exactly. This was not a “fling”. There was emotional attachment involved. And who doesnt find the person they think they love attractive.
I think you might not have read all of my posts. I think this guy is beyond nuts. And, if he thinks he is capable of running a state in the condition he is in, someone needs to point out to him that he is nuts. Not sad. Not a little emotional. Clinically nuts.
I could find my friend the Psychologist and probably make a case that he is not stable enough to run the government.
Clinton on the other hand was a chronic user. He used women and tossed them aside like kleenex. No remorse and no feelings. Clinton was a true narcissist, and sociopath. If someone has to tell you they feel your pain, they are not feeling it.
No comparison other than the equipment used.