To: NorwegianViking
‘If’ and that is a very large if, this has any truth, it would make more sense for the ‘powers that be’ to reduce world population by eliminating 2/3 of Africa, most of China, 3/4 of the middle East and much of southeast Asia. They would have access to rich resources and preserve an educated population able to utilize them. Plus, that would neutralize Islam, which is the greatest thread to civilization.
17 posted on
06/25/2009 7:55:21 AM PDT by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: Islander7
They would have access to rich resources and preserve an educated population able to utilize them. Yeah, except that an educated populace is not as easy to control. Look at all the regimes in the 20th century which killed of millions. They went after the educated. Stalin and Pol Pot come to mind.
25 posted on
06/25/2009 4:46:26 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Islander7
‘If’ and that is a very large if, this has any truth, it would make more sense for the ‘powers that be’ to reduce world population by eliminating 2/3 of Africa, most of China, 3/4 of the middle East and much of southeast Asia. They would have access to rich resources and preserve an educated population able to utilize them. Plus, that would neutralize Islam, which is the greatest thread to civilization.But this is the WORLD Health Organization, the WORLD hates Christ & the U.S. IS a Christian nation (regardless of what B.O. says.). So what better way to quickly get rid of a large Christian population?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson