Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater
From the article...
Colonel Richardson is adamant that it is incapable of a nuclear explosion because it lacks the vital plutonium trigger.

So technically it wasn't even a nuclear weapon when it was lost. It won't be emitting any radiation either.

15 posted on 06/23/2009 1:49:27 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeeSharp
From the article... Colonel Richardson is adamant that it is incapable of a nuclear explosion because it lacks the vital plutonium trigger. So technically it wasn't even a nuclear weapon when it was lost. It won't be emitting any radiation either.

That's how I read it.

So why was it necessary to dump it in the first place if it were incapable of a nuclear explosion?

49 posted on 06/23/2009 2:54:22 PM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson