You obviously don’t even want to read about the Paul newsletters or wacky conspiracy theories. Please tell me why a newsletter was published over 15 years under his name had such offensive and wacky material in them? Why would anyone vote for or follow a man who would either author or allow his name on such material?
I realize that the searches I mentioned would uncover way too much to read. Perhaps just one article could be read. Are you interested in uncovering the truth or simply repeating a mantra with the word Constitution in it?
Angry White Man
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=e2f15397-a3c7-4720-ac15-4532a7da84ca
Alinsky pioneered the technique of dehumanizing people by inferring bad things, even though not true.
You’re ‘article’ is not factual, it’s an Op Ed. It also admits at least twice that they don’t know who wrote the articles.
It also uses the Alsinsky inference technique to mislead the reader into believing something bad about someone, where they have not presented any proof that it is true.
You’re a fake. You have no facts to back up your opinion.